Purity of Sciences

Oh at least i'm second when comes to 'pure-ness'
lolz

rage wrote:

Oh at least i'm second when comes to 'pure-ness'
lolz

I thought you're biology student or something,,

Imma chem student. Study minor in bio too

rage wrote:

Imma chem student. Study minor in bio too

That's third place...lol

mathematician is outta the place

rage wrote:

mathematician is outta the place

No it's not..XD

So wer's he then? How come he's there?

rage wrote:

So wer's he then? How come he's there?

Notice the arrow

------------------->

and what the mathematician said?

I think mathematician is before physic. Where's the calculation where there's no physic around?

Quote :

"THERE IS A story about two friends, who were classmates in high school, talking about their jobs. One of them became a statistician and was working on population trends. He showed a reprint to his former classmate. The reprint started, as usual, with the Gaussian distribution and the statistician explained to his former classmate the meaning of the symbols for the actual population, for the average population, and so on. His classmate was a bit incredulous and was not quite sure whether the statistician was pulling his leg. "How can you know that?" was his query. "And what is this symbol here?" "Oh," said the statistician, "this is pi." "What is that?" "The ratio of the circumference of the circle to its diameter." "Well, now you are pushing your joke too far," said the classmate, "surely the population has nothing to do with the circumference of the circle."

For the rest,check it out :-
CLICK HERE

Omg that's too damn long? Any summary ? ^^

Well what I actually meant is ... if everything works ideally. Or we could made anything to whatever we wanted it to. Wouldn't maths be kinda worthless? Say like when shooting a rocket to moon. We don't need to calculate the amount of thrust, the amount of friction, the heat, the weight bla bla bla Z56**&&80q93q-zzz omgahelllotofdunowtfstuffbbqnesslaserpewpew etc etc. We just do it as though like playing fireworks. lol

rage wrote:

Omg that's too damn long? Any summary ? ^^

Well what I actually meant is ... if everything works ideally. Or we could made anything to whatever we wanted it to. Wouldn't maths be kinda worthless? Say like when shooting a rocket to moon. We don't need to calculate the amount of thrust, the amount of friction, the heat, the weight bla bla bla Z56**&&80q93q-zzz omgahelllotofdunowtfstuffbbqnesslaserpewpew etc etc. We just do it as though like playing fireworks. lol

what do you mean by ideally?

and how does launching rocket moon is equals to playing fireworks?

Ideal liquid? Ideal flow? Ideal gas? Meaning every particle react to what our theory propose or what we want it to be.

rage wrote:

Ideal liquid? Ideal flow? Ideal gas? Meaning every particle react to what our theory propose or what we want it to be.

And you think we don't maths to describe,what maths is describing patterns by using symbols,for example take commutative law,m+n = n+m ,of course we can take describe this is using any language you can think of but can it be described simply like this?

Yea.
m plus n equals to n plus m

LoL!

=.=
swt.........

rage wrote:

Yea.
m plus n equals to n plus m

LoL!

..but as simple and elegant as m+n = n+m,I can give you more real mathematics instead of arithmetics,can you describe that also?

Well...I think can...but its going to freaking confusing yeah ^^v

rage wrote:

Well...I think can...but its going to freaking confusing yeah ^^v

Explain to me pythagoras theorem by using English as medium in your own words..